Skip to content

“More Sensitive”: Woke Hollywood Is Getting Ready to Ruin James Bond. Here’s How

Perhaps all those rumors of a black, female James Bond aren’t based in reality. Then again, maybe they are. At this point, we just don’t know whether Bond will actually look like a suave English gentleman and spy or if he’ll look like…something else.

But what we do know is that the wokies creating the next slew of Bond films, films that won’t include Daniel Craig because he’s out after the most recent “No Time to Die” (spoiler alert: it was time to die), are getting ready to ruin the character no matter who plays it.

How so? By making Bond “more sensitive.” Yes, the killer known for being able to pick up any woman and kill any supervillain, along with all his henchmen, is going to be sensitive. And, presumably, not going to heartlessly pick up and discard bombshell beauties anymore.

News on that comes from The Telegraph, a British paper, which reported that:

The next James Bond films will have bigger roles for women and a more sensitive 007, according to the producers, who said “Bond is evolving just as men are evolving”.

Barbara Broccoli said that the next actor to take the role will continue the work of Daniel Craig, who “cracked Bond open emotionally”.

Craig’s last film, No Time To Die, humanised Bond by making him a devoted family man. It also featured meatier roles for female characters, including Lashana Lynch as a fellow secret agent.

Asked by Variety magazine if those qualities would continue in the next film, Broccoli agreed. “It’s an evolution. Bond is evolving just as men are evolving. I don’t know who’s evolving at a faster pace,” she said.

So say goodbye to the real James Bond, the one that drinks a dozen martinis a day, plays high stakes poker in ritzy casinos across Europe, and is as good with a pickup line and glance as he is with his Walther PPK. Instead of that masculine, tuxedo-clad, indomitable spirit, we’ll get some guy who just says “yes, honey” as his nagging wife rants at him. Wonderful.

Do you believe gun control is unconstitutional?(Required)
This poll gives you free access to our premium politics newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Breitbart’s Nolte summed up the problem with a “sensitive” James Bond quite well in a recent Breitbart op-ed, saying:

Who wants to see a more sensitive James Bond?

Who wants to see an emasculated James Bond?

No one, other than the bubbled freaks and weirdos who make up Barbara Broccoli’s social circle—these awful people who get off on ruining everything fun wants James Bond to get in touch with his feelings.

The whole point of the James Bond character is that he’s an alpha predator working on behalf of Her Majesty’s Secret Service who lives with the knowledge he can die at any moment. Therefore, he seeks out life’s sensual pleasures whenever possible. Moreover, he does not open up emotionally because 1) that could get him killed, and 2) it’s unfair to others to get close when you have such a dangerous job.



But the wokies don’t care. So now James Bond is a feminist whose wife wears the pants. Maybe Spectre will win because it was his turn to change his wife’s son’s diapers.

By: Gen Z Conservative

2 thoughts on ““More Sensitive”: Woke Hollywood Is Getting Ready to Ruin James Bond. Here’s How”

  1. Grew up with Bond, James Bond. It did kinda lose its lustre after Roger Moore. Timothy Dalton and Daniel Craig were OK. But Sean Connery was Bond. Haven’t seen any of the movies after “A Good Time To Die”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.