Skip to content

Masculinity Isn’t Toxic. Ignore the Lies of the Tyranny-Minded Left

The greatest lie currently told by the modern left is that masculinity is toxic. That talking point, in various forms, has come from every segment of society. Teachers tell young boys not to fight, Gillette implies that flirting and grilling is toxic in its ads, school is designed to restrain energetic young men, and physical achievement is looked down upon by a sniveling, effeminate elite.

The reason why the left is spreading such a lie isn’t that it cares about those supposedly hurt by masculinity. The sort of politicians letting tens of thousands of rapists and other violent felons out of jail early couldn’t care less about the women “hurt” by flirtatious behavior in the workplace, the people that lose fights, or whoever might feel “uncomfortable” by the specter of a bearded, well-dressed, muscular man grilling ribeyes while wearing Ray-Bans.

No, the left is attacking masculinity because masculine men are harder to control, as BAP excellently shows in The Bronze Age Mindset.

Think about it for a minute. What type of person is it easier to control- the latte-drinking soyboy with arms smaller than his cheating girlfriend, or the guy that can (and does) benchpress the shot girl at the bar. Who would it be easier to send to a gulag- the modern-Viking that has a beard, is shredded, and is a “contractor” for Blackwater, Triple Canopy, or Aegis, or the guy that sits in a cubicle all day and lets his wife control him and his family? Who would it be easier to oppress- the free-thinker that boxes, hunts, and works outdoors, or the “metrosexual” Starbucks-sipper with a “career” in a soul-sucking field like consulting or finance?

Undoubtedly those that are more masculine are harder to control. They’re the free thinkers, the independent spirits, the family men of vigor and virility.

Hence why the Greeks and Romans, at their best, tried to cultivate such men. Yes, they didn’t want barbarians, brawn without brains is almost as bad as brains without brawn, but they did want men that could fight for their city-state (or empire), that could build a life without the assistance of the treasury, and that embodied the highest ideals of those martial societies. The goal of every real Greek was not to be a middling bureaucrat but to be a hero that became a god, as Hercules was said to have done. The goal of every great Roman was not to become an effeminate, oriental despot, as the later Byzantine emperors became and Xerxes was, but to be a successful, honorable consul that led armies to victory and received a triumph in return.

Those societies cultivated masculine heroism because they knew it was what led to the best outcomes for society; while violence was a possible (and likely) outcome of it, fights between free men were regarded as far better than peace by means of servility. In other words, it was better to die on one’s feet, like Leonidas at the Fiery Gates, than to live on one’s knees, like the many oppressed subjects of Xerxes, Darius, and the Parthians.

The modern left is waging a war on masculinity because it wants to erase that spirit. It wants you not to be strong and free, but to be its weak plaything.

Think of the assaults the left is launching. It is attacking faith, families, financial independence, and hard work. It wants your faith to be in the power of bureaucrats, not in the God of our forefathers. It wants your family to either be dependent on its generosity, rather than your hands. It wants you to be dependent on it rather than independent because of your hard work and financial responsibility.

Should Joe Biden resign?(Required)
This poll gives you free access to our premium politics newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

So, to get there, it lies. It pretends masculinity is toxic. It ignores that real men build and care for families, pretending that “masculinity” means non-consensually knocking up the secretary and then discarding her in the chase of another. It pretends that all who fight are wolves, ignoring the many sheepdogs that protect their kin and fellows. Like the attacks on knights, framing them as thuggish butcherers rather than chivalrous warriors of God, attacks on masculinity are misrepresentations dishonestly framed as honest criticism.

We conservatives must reject those attacks. Masculinity isn’t toxic, it’s one of the most beneficial things for society. A society of masculine men has strong families, is full of those that deal honestly with one another, and can defend itself from the wolves at the door.

What is better- the England of the British Empire, a society that produced men like Churchill, Kitchener, and Nelson, or the England of the modern-day, which allows suicide bombings to happen so as to not seem “racist.” What would you prefer- a nation of men like George Washington or a nation of men like Obama and Paul Ryan? What is better, the Greek-reading, iron-lifting right championed by BAP, or the court-jester conservative, weak right pushed by Bill Kristol and John Boehner? Undoubtedly the former is better in each case and that is because the former is masculine and the latter is weak.

Bravery is superior to cowardice. Honor is superior to deceit. Chivalry is superior to licentiousness. Independence is superior to dependence. Masculinity is superior to weakness.

Fight the lies of the left. Masculinity isn’t toxic and attacks on it are meant to control you, not make your life better. So, endeavor to be a real man. Raise a family. Surround yourself with strong men and tender women. Defend what’s yours and build a successful life.


9 thoughts on “Masculinity Isn’t Toxic. Ignore the Lies of the Tyranny-Minded Left”

  1. “The greatest lie currently told by the modern left is that masculinity is toxic.”

    Not believed…

    Not in the South. Never was, never will be.

    1. It’s believed by more people than you might think, even in the South.

      For example, were your kids told to fight the bully or report the bully? Are they told to be nice and respectful of all viewpoints, or to stand up for what is right and vociferously attack evil? Masculinity means fighting, both verbally and with fists, for what is right and true. Most schools and parents have forgotten that and instead taught boys that fighting is wrong and that they should be pleasant.

  2. We taught our kids to never throw the first punch but go to town defending yourself or someone else who needs defending. We also told them school would punish them, but we wouldn’t and we would back them 100%. But we are, as my kids frequently remind us, not like thier friends parents….

    1. That’s certainly the right thing. It’s what my parents taught me.

      However, other than one or two other families with similar mindsets, no others did. They all told their sons to whine to the teacher about it. I think that’s highly concerning.

  3. There’s a flip side to your story, not only are we losing the protectors, the Culture of Narcissism that is proliferating is a dumbing down of men’s psychology.

    Masculinity is a man’s passion for life, that’s why emasculation is so dangerous to men, it robs them of their essence, their life force, and eventually making a man an empty shell of his former self.

    Similar to IQ and emotional Intelligence; masculine intelligence is getting lower with western men, males are losing their core collective identity, by a nefarious social (Establishment) construct. The lack of MI is pushing men, as a whole, further into what Jungian psychology call “the shadow.” The shadow is where narcissism takes on a toxic pathology, the boyish men that only obey their raw masculinity, and because masculinity is on an instinctual level, it’s on autopilot and harder to define, this social (de)construct is fostering a Lord of the Flies mentality where boyish men have a hair trigger sensitivity that causes their passion energy to easily explode.

    Passion energy is different from emotional energy and intellectual energy, it is lightning quick, explosive, and short lived. It is impulsive, it is the spark of attraction, and without the executive function of the brain controlling it, it is pure animal behavior, lawless and destructive, it is immaturity, its teenage behavior exhibited by grown up men. A narcissist is a person whose psychological age is much lower than their chronological age, and it affects both males and females (the girlish woman that obeys their raw femininity and will eventually emasculate all the men in their lives)

    A healthy masculinity is developing an executive function of a male’s brain to control and steer their animal behaviors, to have the awareness to take it off autopilot mode and into manual mode. It’s also learning mature boundary functions. I find having a learned skill called “Observing Ego” has the potential to foster psychological growth, maturity…to be cool headed.

    Masculinity is a complex psychology, more so than the IQ spectrum and emotional triggers. It is so complex that Ancient Civilizations had to decode it by using mythology, by telling stories using various gods to describe the multi circuits of masculinity. Each god and their specific story, describes just one aspect of masculinity. It’s unfortunate that most men today can’t even describe what masculinity is in just one sentence, the majority of men have a very low masculine Intelligence score, and that is by designed (the military will make a man out of you, son, go die for corporate profits), not only is it taking away the heathy protectors in our society, it is also creating boyish men that only obey their animal behavior that’s destructive to society too.

    1. Well said. If you’d ever like to write a guest article on that please let me know. I think it’s something that many more people need to hear.

      1. Yes, of course.

        My above comment citations includes psychiatrist Dr. Paul Dobransky (former dating coach) that led seminars for “Masculine Intelligence,” published several books, and he currently writes articles on “Psychology Today” websites, another citation goes to authors Moore and Gillette: “King, Warrior, Magician, Lover: Rediscovering the Archetypes of the Mature Masculine.”

        I’m personally fond of the latest underground men’s movement of “neo-masculinty” best described by YouTuber Paul Joseph Watson – “Neomasculinity: The Male Backlash Against Toxic Women.” It’s a healthier version of the 1950’s masculine men and more inclusive of today’s women.

        But, I have a wide-range of subjects that I like to deep dive into on my own.

        You can reach me at my email address that I used when I posted my comments.

        Have a good day.

Comments are closed.