Skip to content

The Fauci-China Connection and Its Dangers

Why You Should be Worried about the Fauci-China Connection

I’ve made no bones about not being a fan of “Dr.” Fauci. For one, I think him to be a self-aggrandizing politician who embraces abominable policies for his own gain and notoriety rather than a serious doctor. If he were any good, he’d have worked in the private sector at some point and his work history, a litany of failures, speaks for itself. Similarly, his continual flip-flopping and lying, especially on topics such as masks and herd immunity, is indefensible. But, I (naively) assumed that he was at least pro-America. Now that the Fauci-China connection has come to light, I’m having my doubts.

Here’s what the New York Post, a reliably conservative news source, has to say about the Fauci-China connection:

“Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases had shelled out a total of $7.4 million to the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab — which has become the focus of theories about the origin of COVID-19, according to Newsweek

In other words, he’s been helping fund the Chinese virology lab that released the Covid Plague on the world. A lab, I should add, that’s history is almost as abysmal as Facui’s; it didn’t meet safety standards in five areas, which is concerning given the deadly viruses that it researches.

But that’s not all. Here’s what The Gateway Pundit reported about the Fauci-China connection:

“In 2007, Dr. Fauci personally licensed and saw to the performance of clinical trials to create a vaccine for the H5N1 pandemic that was previously declared by Fauci.  The company that Fauci worked with to create and stockpile a vaccine for the avian flu was Sanofi PasteurFast forward to February 18, 2020, as America was preparing for the China coronavirus, the HHS engaged Sanofi Pasteur to help develop a coronavirus vaccine.  At the same time and through April, Dr. Fauci was arguing against the use of hydroxychloroquine as a cure for the China coronavirus

Sanofi Pasteur is related to one of the very first western labs located in the Republic of China.  One of it’s investors is George Soros.

Soros also invests in a company in Wuhan, China, where the Coronavirus outbreak began.  That company is called Wuxi AppTech, which just so happens, they develop vaccines too.  This company is also related to the former Head of the China Communist Party, Jiang Zemin.

So, not only is Fauci involved with the lab that Covid probably was released from, but he also has sketchy ties to companies owned by Chinese party officials and George Soros.

Will the Red Wave come crashing down on the Democrat's heads in November?(Required)
This poll gives you free access to our premium politics newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Now, perhaps that’s all innocent. To be completely fair and forthright, there’s no real evidence that Fauci has used Covid to enrich himself. Personally, I don’t believe he has been. While men like former General Mattis and Senator Jon Ossof enriched themselves as part of China’s efforts to buy influence in America, I don’t think Fauci was one of them.

Instead, I think it’s about ideology. He’s a globalist. That’s why he shoveled millions and millions of dollars to the Chinese lab despite our being a competitor with China, defends and defers to the pro-China WHO, and refuses to use his bully pulpit to hold China accountable for this mess. He naively wants to pull the US and China closer together rather than keep that enemy nation at arm’s reach.

To me, that’s worse than him taking money. The corrupt can be dealt with; we know what they want. The ideologues, especially the globalist ideologues, cannot be. In my opinion, the Fauci-China connection exists not because of greed, as the Gateway Pundit hints, but because of ideology. You should be concerned.

By: Gen Z Conservative. Follow me on Parler, Gab, and Facebook

Order your FREE Fraud hat here to show you know the election was fraudulent: I Love My Freedom

Image at top from:

10 thoughts on “The Fauci-China Connection and Its Dangers”

    1. You got that right Fuzzy Fauci is a traitor and gave Pres Trump bullshyt advice, the rat faced bastard needs to hang at gitmo imho

  1. LIKE the “Retrumplican” shirts LOL….as for the beady eyed snake fauci, he needs to be HUNG BY THE NECK and left to rot imho…..I see biden talked with Jing or whatever his name is, spent 2 hours trying to decide on a place to meet for biden to kiss his ass! again imho

    1. IMO, Fauci needs to be renditioned to a location beyond the reach of the American legal system, given extrajudicial “extremely enhanced” interrogation with no methods off limits, and burned at the stake for worldwide mass murder. Any accomplices uncovered during his interrogation should meet the same fate.

    1. Now thanks to the braindead moron buydung, chicom’s fuzzy fauci, soros, gates et al are pushing immigrants with covid over the border with moronic buydungs approval…keep the covid lies going…destroy the U.S., bankrupt with with 1.9 trillion dollar giveaways…shyt!!! March the marine corps into the imitation white house and haul ALL OF THEM TO GITMO to the gallows imho

  2. Fauci’s involvement in the corona virus harvested from the Chinese Horseshoe bat, SARS-Cov2, the virus causing COVID, is much deeper and sinister. In 2010 two Chinese corona-virologists working at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Zhengli-Shi and Li-Meng Yan, reported that the SARS corona virus harvested from the Horseshoe bat did not readily transmit directly to humans. See: Li-Meng Yan, Zhengli-Shi, et al., Angiotensin-converting enzyme2 (ACE2) proteins of different bat species confer variable susceptibility to SARS-CoV entry, Arch. Virol (2010) 155:1563-1569.

    In 2015 the SARS-CoV-2 virus that was harvested from the Chinese Horseshoe bat underwent “Gain-Of-Function” (“GOF”) research conducted jointly by virologists working at China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology and at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. Raph Baric, Ph.D., an epidemiologist, headed the U.N.C.- Chapel Hill team. See: Vineet Menarchery, Zhengli-Shi Li, et al., A SARS-like cluster if circulating bat corona viruses shows potential for human emergence, Nature Medicine (2015) 23:112, 1508-1513.

    GOF research on a pathogenic virus has one purpose: to increase the transmissibility and pathogenicity/lethality of a pathogenic virus. See the National Institute of Health Office of Science Policy statement regarding GOF research available at Gain of Function Research – Office of Science Policy (

    The 2015 GOF research was partially funded by the NIAID, the agency directed by Anthony Fauci, M.D.; the National Institute of Aging of the NIH under awards U19A1109761, U19A1107810, A1085524, F32AI102561, and K99AG049092); and by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under awards 81290341 and 31470260. The Chinese National Natural Science Foundation is an agency of the China’s government, which is the Chinese Communist party.

    The team built a chimeric virus encoding a novel zoonotic CoV spike protein from the RsHC014-CoV sequence that was isolated from the Chinese Horseshoe bat. Zhengli-Shi Li, provided the SCH014 spike sequences and plasmids.

    Before the 2015 GOF research, the Horseshoe bat corona virus was not expected to readily transmit to humans without a spike modification in a secondary host. Also, the virus’ pathogenicity was not expected to increase.

    As a result of the 2015 GOF research the Horseshoe bat corona virus caused robust infections in both human and mice airway cultures without RBD adaptation. And more troubling, the infections did not respond to any known therapeutic.

    In short, the 2015 GOF research increased both transmissibility and pathogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 virus harvested from the Chinese Horseshoe bat. The 4-year lapse between 2015 and 2019 is ample time to further increase the transmissibility and pathogenicity of this virus.

    In 2020, Li-Meng Yan, and several of her assistance reported:

    SARS-CoV-2 shows biological characteristics that are inconsistent with a naturally occurring, zoonotic virus. In this report, we describe the genomic, structural, medical, and literature evidence, which, when considered together, strongly contradicts the natural origin theory. The evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 should be a laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as a template and/or backbone. Building upon the evidence, we further postulate a synthetic route for SARS-CoV-2, demonstrating that the laboratory-creation of this coronavirus is convenient and can be accomplished in approximately six months. (Emphasis added).

    See: Li-Meng Yan, et al., Unusual Features of the SARS-Co-V2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution And Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route (2020).

    Li-Meng Yan fled China and published her comments in a non-medical journal in order to disseminate the information promptly. She has since “disappeared,” as has her mother, whom Chinese authorities arrested promptly after the article’s publication.

  3. Before striking my comment, please note that I’ve cited the content of specific peer-reviewed virology journals that directly support each of my assertions. I possess copies of all articles. I’ll forward pdf copies of each upon request.

    The information I’ve just provided is fully accurate and important. I’m unaware of any mention of my comments by any media.

Comments are closed.