The Michigan Audit of Dominion Voting Machines Was Released. Here’s What It Found
Before jumping into the details of the audit of Dominion voting machines in Michigan, here’s the background. Dominion was used in 24 states and there were accusations of impropriety and voter fraud. Specifically, strange jumps in votes for Biden and vote total numbers, along with the fact that at least 6,000 votes were changed from Trump to Biden in one Michigan county, made people believe that the Dominion machines were compromised. As a result, an audit was started so that the truth about Dominion voting machines could be ascertained.
While the results of that audit of Dominion voting machines were originally sealed, a Michigan judge ruled that the results of the audit could be released. Thanks to that decision, we can now see just how fraudulent the results tallied by Dominion were. Here is what the audit found. I scanned through the audit of Dominion voting machines in its entirety and have included the most relevant parts from the “preliminary conclusions” of the audit, which is Part B of the Allied Security Operations Group report. The full report can be found here.
Think your mask is completely useless, just like John Roberts? Mad at your governor’s Covid policies? Then order one of these to show your displeasure! Buy one here: https://teespring.com/this-mask-is-usel-october-2020
The Preliminary Conclusions of the Audit:
Preliminary Conclusion #2: “the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results”
“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.”
Preliminary Conclusion of the Audit of Dominion Voting Machines #4: Votes were Intentionally Flipped by Dominion Software
“The Antrim County Clerk and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson have stated that the election night error (detailed above by the vote “flip” from Trump to Biden,was the result of human error caused by the failure to update the Mancelona Township tabulator prior to election night for a down ballot race. We disagree and conclude that the vote flip occurred because of machine error built into the voting software designed to create error.”
Preliminary Conclusion of the Audit of Dominion Voting Machines #6: The Error Rate is Absurdly High
“The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity.”
Preliminary Conclusion of the Audit of Dominion Voting Machines #8: Dominion Voting Systems is Flawed
“The tabulation log for the forensic examination of the server for Antrim County from December 6, 2020 consists of 15,676 individual events, of which 10,667 or 68.05% of the events were recorded errors. These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication. This high error rates proves the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws.”
Preliminary Conclusion of the Audit of Dominion Voting Machines #12 + #13: Dominion Sent Far too Many Ballots to “Adjudication,” Which Opens the Door for Fraud
“A staggering number of votes required adjudication. This was a 2020 issue not seen in previous election cycles still stored on the server. This is caused by intentional errors in the system. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency or audit trail. Our examination of the server logs indicates that this high error rate was incongruent with patterns from previous years. The statement attributing these issues to human error is not consistent with the forensic evaluation, which points more correctly to systemic machine and/or software errors. The systemic errors are intentionally designed to create errors in order to push a high volume of ballots to bulk adjudication.
13. The linked video demonstrates how to cheat at adjudication:
Preliminary Conclusion of the Audit of Dominion Voting Machines #14: The System was not Updated Properly
“Antrim County failed to properly update its system. A purposeful lack of providing basic computer security updates in the system software and hardware demonstrates incompetence, gross negligence, bad faith, and/or willful non-compliance in providing the fundamental system security required by federal and state law. There is no way this election management system could have passed tests or have been legally certified to conduct the 2020 elections in Michigan under the current laws. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures – Michigan requires full compliance with federal standards as determined by a federally accredited voting system laboratory”
Preliminary Conclusion of the Audit of Dominion Voting Machines #15: The Adjudication Logs are Missing
“Significantly, the computer system shows vote adjudication logs for prior years;but all adjudication log entries for the 2020 election cycle are missing. The adjudication process is the simplest way to manually manipulate votes. The lack of records prevents any form of audit accountability, and their conspicuous absence is extremely suspicious since the files exist for previous years using the same software. Removal of these files violates state law and prevents a meaningful audit, even if the Secretary wanted to conduct an audit. We must conclude that the 2020 election cycle records have been manually removed.”
Preliminary Conclusion of the Audit of Dominion Voting Machines #16: The Server Logs from Election Night are Missing and Their Disappearance is Suspicious
“Likewise, all server security logs prior to 11:03 pm on November 4, 2020 are missing. This means that all security logs for the day after the election, on election day, and prior to election day are gone. Security logs are very important to an audit trail, forensics, and for detecting advanced persistent threats and outside attacks, especially on systems with outdated system files. These logs would contain domain controls, authentication failures, error codes, times users logged on and off, network connections to file servers between file accesses,internet connections, times, and data transfers. Other server logs before November 4, 2020 are present; therefore, there is no reasonable explanation for the security logs to be missing.”
Preliminary Conclusion of the Audit of Dominion Voting Machines #18: Updates to the System were Suspicious
“The Election Event Designer Log shows that Dominion ImageCast Precinct Cards were programmed with new ballot programming on 10/23/2020 and then again after the election on 11/05/2020. These system changes affect how ballots are read and tabulated, and our examination demonstrated a significant change in voter results using the two different programs. In accordance with the Help America Vote Act, this violates the 90-day Safe Harbor Period which prohibits changes to election systems, registries, hardware/software updates without undergoing re-certification. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures – Michigan requires full compliance with federal standards as determined by a federally accredited voting system laboratory.”
Preliminary Conclusion of the Audit of Dominion Voting Machines #19: Software Changes Obfuscated Voter Fraud and the Michigan Secretary of State is Lying
“The only reason to change software after the election would be to obfuscate evidence of fraud and/or to correct program errors that would de-certify the election. Our findings show that the Central Lake Township tabulator tape totals were significantly altered by utilizing two different program versions (10/23/2020 and 11/05/2020), both of which were software changes during an election which violates election law, and not just human error associated with the Dominion Election Management System. This is clear evidence of software generated movement of votes. The claims made on the Office of the Secretary of State website are false.”
Preliminary Conclusion of the Audit of Dominion Voting Machines #21-22:
Preliminary Conclusion of the Audit of Dominion Voting Machines #24: The Results are Suspiciously Similar to those in Venezuela
“Michigan resident Gustavo Delfino, a former professor of mathematics in Venezuela and alumni of University of Michigan, offered a compelling affidavit [Exhibit 2] recognizing the inherent vulnerabilities in the SmartMatic electronic voting machines (software which was since incorporated into Dominion VotingSystems) during the 2004 national referendum in Venezuela (see attached declaration). After 4 years of research and 3 years of undergoing intensive peer review, Professor Delfino’s paper was published in the highly respected”Statistical Science” journal, November 2011 issue (Volume 26, Number 4) with title “Analysis of the 2004 Venezuela Referendum: The Official Results Versus the Petition Signatures.”
The intensive study used multiple mathematical approaches to ascertain the voting results found in the 2004 Venezuelanreferendum. Delfino and his research partners discovered not only the algorithm used to manipulate the results, but also the precise location in the election processing sequence where vulnerability in machine processing would provide such an opportunity. According to Prof Delfino, the magnitude of the difference between the official and the true result in Venezuela estimated at 1,370,000votes. Our investigation into the error rates and results of the Antrim Countyvoting tally reflect the same tactics, which have also been reported in other Michigan counties as well. This demonstrates a national security issue.”
My Conclusion: It Sure Looks Like Dominion Machines Enabled Fraud
Sometimes it’s hard to know what to believe. As you can read in my article on if John Roberts visited Epstein’s island, there is normally evidence for and against conspiracies. But, in this case, it looks like the audit of Dominion voting machines showed conclusively that the election results, in Michigan, at least, were fraudulent.
Votes were changed. Adjudication was used far more than normal and the logs surrounding it were wiped, as were the server logs. Suspicious software updates took place. The machines flipped votes. Who, and what, can be trusted? Hundreds of thousands of ballots were adjudicated around the nation. The margin of error in some states was quite slim. If fraud with adjudication of ballots happened in Michigan, why not other states? What the Dominion audit shows is that there are many suspect aspects of this election.
The simple fact is that this audit makes it look like the election was stolen. In areas where similar Dominion machines were used, how do we know that those machines did not also flip votes? How can we trust the election results?
We can’t. A full audit of Dominion voting machines needs to take place. If Trump still loses, so be it. But we cannot rest until we know that the election results are valid. Right now, it appears that they are not. If the audit is to be believed, the election results are nothing if not fraudulent. Please share this article so that more patriots learn that!
By: Gen Z Conservative
If you liked this article on the audit of Dominion voting machines, please consider leaving a tip through PayPal to help support the site and support a young conservative!